The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern (5 stars)
I've said it before, that I'm willing to forgive a number of sins if a book is beautifully written -- and that definitely applies here. Morgenstern's prose is simply luminous, so much so that her descriptions of this amazing circus bring it to life as an additional character in the novel. In a way, that is an apt description, because the circus -- and what is created through/within it -- comes to symbolize much of what this story is about. I loved everything about this: the setting, the time period, the characters (both main and secondary), the pacing. It did seem a bit slow at first, and there are complaints about the ending, and it's been mentioned too that nothing really seems to happen. None of those really bothered me at all, although I can see where other readers might take fault with the book. This is one of those instances where I wish the author was more established, with many more novels waiting for me to catch up on. Instead, I'll just wait (im)patiently for her next novel.
Ruby Red by Kersten Gier (3 stars)
I mentioned last month that I was getting annoyed by the dearth of YA series. It seems like every book published for YA these days is the first book in a series (usually a trilogy). That would be fine if each book in the series contained enough action and plot devices to actually power a 300 page novel. However, most of the time, it seems these books are just full of filler, with a few bits of action. It's as though the authors pitched an idea for a great novel -- perhaps 400-500 pages in length -- and the publishers said, "Great! Now let's take that idea and break it into three 300-page novels instead!" That really seems applicable in this instance; nothing gets moving on the plot with this novel until almost halfway in, and then with just a couple of quick jaunts to the past, the book is over and you're left waiting on the next two to see what happens. To be fair, there's a good bit of exposition shared, but it's not enough to require breaking this story into a series. The premise is interesting, but I was annoyed by the main characters. Gwyneth seems more like a 12 year old than a 16 year old, and there are some bits that just aren't believable -- and I'm willing to suspend belief for a LOT of things. Finally, I just thought parts weren't well-written at all, though that might have more to do with the translation than with the original novel. Just a mediocre read, but (of course) I'll probably check out the next two when they're released.
Across the Universe by Beth Revis (2 stars)
I've seen multiple good reviews for this book, but of all the recent dystopian/scifi YA novels I've read recently, this one was by far the weakest. The world-building was decent (despite some negative reviews to the contrary -- sometimes I wonder just how much people retain from what they actually read). My issues really had to do more with style and especially with characterization. I don't think Revis is a particularly strong writer, and her choice of alternating perspectives actually makes that worse. The pacing was jumpy, the transitions were poor, and the character development was inconsistent and weak. I'm not sure I've read a less likeable character than Amy all year long; the bad part is that she is not intentionally unlikeable. I mean, sure, I understand how jarring life would be if you were awakened from your cryogenic slumber years ahead of schedule, but her behavior is utterly inconsistent, her dialogue is annoying, and Revis really needs to let go of all the shouting and screeching her characters seem to do. This book -- the premise, at least -- had a lot of potential, but it was too poorly executed for me.
Why We Broke Up by Daniel Handler (4 stars)
I waffled over whether to give this a 3 star or a 4 star rating; if I split it down the middle, Goodreads would force me to round up, so I'm going with 4 stars. :) First of all, this is another instance where I'm in love with everything that makes up the "package" of this novel: the square shape, the glossy pages, the amazing art -- so full of lush, vibrant color -- by Maira Kalman, the blurbs on the back cover from other popular YA authors, sharing their own "got dumped" stories. I have no qualms about e-books, but this is definitely an instance where you'd miss out of much of the reading experience of this novel if you only opt for a digital copy. As for the story itself...With my taste in reading material, there's no question that I'm willing to suspend ALL KINDS of disbelief for the length of a story. But asking me to believe that this is a 300+ page LETTER written to her ex-boyfriend is stretching things. I'd have been much happier just reading Min's side of the story -- even with her speaking directly to Ed -- and would have preferred, I think, the ambiguity of not knowing if she's actually speaking to him, writing to him, etc. Asking me to believe that this was all a letter included in the box of things she's returning is just asking me to believe too much, for some reason. What I liked most about this story is that it's a story about the reality of relationships; to that end, I think Min and Ed are both portrayed authentically. I thought that Min got a little long-winded at time; sometimes those stream-of-consciousness descriptive paragraphs were quite lovely, and other times, they just were too damn long. Another reviewer commented that this is a book for adults, even though it looks like a book about and for teens, and I agree with that. This is a story for those of us on the far side of an ended romance, safely removed from the perils of high school (aww hell, who am I kidding? even college and beyond) relationships. There was so much of my younger self that I recognized in this book, and the me I am now could only symphathize all the more with Min.
The Girl Who Was on Fire by Leah Wilson (3 stars)
The English geek in me absolutely LOVED the idea of this book; my literary criticism courses were some of my most favorite classes in college. The English teacher in me sees so much potential in this collection as well; I think the Hunger Games trilogy offers a great way to bridge current YA literature not only with classic texts but also to units in history, economics, politics, media, and more. Unfortunately, many of the essays are poorly edited with factual errors (it's Dolly the sheep, not Polly) and several of them are too "chatty." There's nothing necessarily wrong with a chatty tone, but in several cases it actually distracts from the main point of the essay. So all in all, this is a mixed bag; still, many of the ideas in these essays offer excellent discussion points for the trilogy.
The Son of Neptune by Rick Riordan (5 stars)
I always think about the term "guilty read" when I think about the Percy Jackson books. It's not that there's anything embarassing about these; it's not that they're poorly written or derivative. It's more that, regardless of any small flaws they might have, I still grab them the minute they are published and then proceed to devour them, enjoying every minute of the story. As a result, I almost always give them a 5-star rating because I can't really be objective about them. In this instance though, I think Riordan is back in top form. Characterization is top notch -- with both old and new characters facing several challenges -- and the plot zips right along, with humor and tension and thrills. Riordan knows his audience, it's clear, but he delivers a read that will entice even more readers to join them.
Abandon by Meg Cabot (1 star)
For the life of me, I cannot understand why Meg Cabot is so popular (there are a number of other authors I feel the same about: James Patterson and John Grisham top the list). I've read a few of her novels, and while the general idea is always promising enough to make me pick them up (despite what I'm almost 100% assured I'll find inside), the execution without fail makes me wish I'd never bothered. Pierce is one of the most annoying characters I've seen in some time, and like Meena Harper from Insatiable, she's weak-willed and too willing to count on the men in her life to save her. The other characters are no better -- but I can't really say much more about them because they were so minimally developed. My biggest issue, though, is Cabot's plotting and pacing; she spends too much time hinting at things to draw them out before finally just coming out and saying them. It's annoying, and my guess is that it's done to just draw the book out long enough to -- dammit! -- turn it into a series. Because nothing happens. Really. Lots of things are set up to happen, but nothing happens, except a bunch of things that happened earlier and are told in a jumble of flashbacks and disjointed scenes. It's just a mess. That's harsh, but I can't help it -- I was just so frustrated by almost everything in this novel.
The Disappearing Spoon (and other true tales of madness, love, and the history of the world from the Periodic Table of the Elements) by Sam Kean (4 stars)
I enjoyed this. Chemistry was one of my favorite classes in high school; that was a long time ago, so I'm surprised (happily) at how much I remembered. Kean has a very approachable style, although some of his sentences can get a little clunky and long. Still, he has a knack for drawing out the interesting parts of these stories, as well as the humor, and I thought that he moved from element to element, story to story, nicely.
The Borrower by Rebecca Makkai (3 stars)
I really waffled back and forth on this book. My experience might have been a bit different, I think, if I had read it instead of listening to the audio version. I think the reader (who sounded just like Lea Michelle from Glee) annoyed me enough that I tied her too closely to the main character (Lucy) to remain objective. Still, I found Lucy to be obnoxious, and I'm thinking I would've been annoyed by the things she says and does regardless of a narrator's voice. Essentially, I think there are a couple of different stories going on here; the story about Lucy herself, and her background and where she comes from and how she comes to know herself, is one -- and it's the one I found most interesting. The story of Lucy's friendship with Ian and their subsequent adventure is okay -- it's a lot more telling than showing, and it requires that you ignore some pretty big plot holes and implausible choices. There's also some really clever story parodies going on, and a lot about books and how books can save you, as well as the day-to-day type stuff that takes place in a library -- and all of those things were good. It's just that those three parts didn't really come together evenly for me, and that's ultimately what impacted my opinion of this book.
A Brief History of Montmaray by Michelle Cooper (3 stars)
I didn't even know this book existed. I originally picked up The Fitzosbornes in Exile from the public library and noticed that it said "The Montmaray Journals #2" in really tiny print on the front cover. So I had to track down the first novel before I could read the second. I'm of mixed minds about this novel; I think the characters were interesting, although some of them just aren't developed enough to fulfill the roles in which Cooper places them. The novel is told through a series of journal entries, which works well enough, despite the intrusion of the author's hand pretty heavily in some of the more descriptive passages. The journal entries carry the plot forward nicely, for the most part; I did get a little annoyed with the "Oh no! What's that?.....(time elapses)....You won't believe what just happened. I will try to write it all down..." stylistic device. There are some twists that I'm still on the fence about, but overall this was an okay read.
Everybody Sees the Ants by A.S. King (5 stars)
So I wrote a short little review here, but then I decided that in no way did it do credit to this book, so I'm going to sit down and write something much longer, because this book freakin' deserves it. There is so much to say -- I just don't know that I'm up to the task. But I will try. In the meantime, go find this book -- from your local bookstore, online, at your library, off your friend's bookshelf -- and read it. Then go find everything else that King has written and read those books too. Then we'll talk.
**edited 2/1/12 I have spent days -- DAYS -- trying to write this review in my head, but nothing I write does this book justice. Bullying is a difficult topic to portray honestly, I think. There's a lot of risk in getting too sentimental about it -- as adults, we sometimes talk about how we got bullied in school or how someone we know was bullied or whatever, but we forget that, no matter how terrible things might have been for us, time and distance DO alter our perspectives. We also run the risk of oversimplifying things, or looking at the issue from a limited viewpoint (which can't be helped sometimes -- it's hard not to filter stuff through your own experiences). But King writes about bullying in a way that is raw but not graphic, a way that is honest and unflinching but still somehow hopeful and gentle. She addresses this issue from so many different points of view, in such a subtle manner. The characters are skillfully drawn, the dialogue is so realistic; every sentence King writes is clear and vibrant and cuts to the bone. (And the ants, omg, the ants! They are the best!!!)
The thing that has stayed with me the most about this novel is that this is a YA novel that I think EVERY ADULT NEEDS TO READ. If you care about kids and you want to take a stand against bullying, then you read this book and you do what King suggests: you ACT.
Ship Breaker by Paolo Bacigalupi (3 stars)
I could go as high as 3.5 stars for this. I realize that's just an average rating, and honestly, this is a really well-written book, in many ways much better than just average. The characters are well-developed, the setting (a dystopian Gulf Coast) is exceptionally well-drawn, and the pacing is deft. But even though I love dystopian novels -- and I appreciate the environmental theme developed so adeptly here -- the story itself just didn't draw me in. It was an okay read, but I just didn't feel connected to any of the characters. That wouldn't stop me at all from recommending this to others; it's a good book, but it just didn't hold my interest.
Recent Comments